history - but also the recent news - teach that the ultimate guarantor of solvency ' of the state banking system remains solvent to make the system draws on the debt (15) . From here, the unresolved issues of moral hazard, that the profits remain private while losses are socialized.
In conclusion, the banks have the privilege granted by the state to exercise the credit function, and so 'to create money through the banking monetary function (16) and as having a substantial income on the interest rate differential applied Mediation of savings. It seems obvious that this income amplified by monetary function remains to be suitably justified if commensurate reduction function of asymmetric information, namely ' through the recruitment by the banking system for credit risk on companies.
other hand, if the credit risk and 'downloaded outside of the banking system, possibly located in the financial markets using financial instruments lack transparency, the annuity becomes a legitimate extra income entirely unjustified. But this' and that 'worse, you have to admit,' the bank so that the institution 'and organized' totally useless, just end in itself! (17)
---
(1) ML Katz, HSRosen, Ed McGraw-Hill (1998)
(2) RADE Fusco, DWMcLeavey, JEPinto, DE.Runkle, Ed AIMR (2000) - The time value of money Reflects relashinship Between the time, cash flow, and an interest rate .
(3) PD Groenewegen, G. Vaggi, Carocci Ed (2002) - According to the monetarist theories of M. Friedman, H. Simons, J. Angell, K. Bruner and A. Meltzer stability 'of price is reached in the best possible way by setting a target rate of growth of money supply. In this respect, and 'quite worrying that the beginning of 2007, the Fed publishes data on monetary aggregate M3. [ http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggregati_monetari ] should also be noted that the consolidated balance sheet of the Fed, in its essence inviariato entries since 1951, in the last 18 months' exploded. [ http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp09120.pdf ] [ http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/06/11/a-look -inside-feds-balance-sheet-61109-update / ]
(4) for this can 'be useful to the brilliant idea of \u200b\u200bFischer Black ( Exploring General Equilibrium , 1995). Fischer Black and 'co-authors of a Black-Sholes equation ( Black-Sholes-Merton Model ) used to price options. [ http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modello_di_Black-Scholes-Merton ]. See Perry Mehrling [ http://books.google.it/books?id=OKDbnWuspo4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=perry+mehrling ]. The Black-Sholes formula is not 'nothing but the heat equation with clothes covered financial [ http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equazione_del_calore ]. Curiosity ': the Black-Sholes equation has established a baseline analysis of Grisha Perelman [ http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0211159 ] [ http://arxiv.org/abs / math.DG/0303109] that have failed to settle the Thurston geometrization conjecture [ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ThurstonsGeometrizationConjecture.html ] and the Poincare Conjecture.
(5) A. Saunders, MMCornett, M. Anolli, Ed McGraw-Hill (2004)
(6) See Article 11 Banking Act (TUB), Leg. 385/1993, now in force. The reserve collection of savings from the public in favor of banks and 'was introduced into Italian Banking Act of 1936 (see Article 1, Royal Decree 375/1936). According to this law to raise funds from the public and the provision of credit had qualified public functions, but now - according to the Banking today - these activities 'are activities classified as' business as "confidential". The Banking Act of 1936 was developed during the fascism and prepared by the Corporation of Insurance and Credit. The leader approved 'first draft decree Act March 3, 1935. Before 1926, the exercise of the 'bank, and in general the pursuit of activities' economic, was free and the legislature was concerned only to regulate the issuance of paper money, and this' following the scandal of the Bank Roman, the constitution of the Bank of Italy (see August 10, 1893 Law n.449) through the merger of National Bank of the Kingdom of Italy, the Banca Nazionale Toscana and Banca Toscana credit in serious condition after the decoction crisis of 1893, with complaint of serious scandals in the conduct of the National Bank and internal relations with the government. From 1926 until 1936, at the dawn of autarchy, the principles of economic liberalism began to find the first exception to which were dictated specific disciplines in the field of mortgage credit and agricultural credit. The corporate stock of the activity 'collection of savings from the public in favor of banks, and is' committed even in the current legislation even though it is not the most' qualified by the legislature as the public interest and in spite of the art. 47 of the Constitution to propose a vision of cooperative (and not corporate or fascist) for the year of the credit. Last but not least we must also highlight that the system (economic) bank and corporate-style self still in force - with universal banks held up by anti-historical privileges and inquitanti conflicts of interest and with central banks that make economic policy, and not only monetary, without democratic control - not only is devoid of utility 'social (in part because of the management of credit risk arising cd to ditribute model), but also can' be seriously detrimental to the safety, freedom 'and dignity' office, as the recent crisis in the sub-prime mortgages showed! The abolition of the reserve to raise funds for banks and 'indispensable to restore the principles of cooperation, utility' social, security and dignity 'as enshrined human art. 41 of the Constitution also apply to the banking sector after the reform of the Banking Act has definitively ruled that the bank 'business and no longer' feature of public interest. The state has a duty to encourage and protect the savings and regulate, coordinate and monitor the operation of credit in a more 'respectful of the freedom' to economic initiative and utilities' social than it has done so far, freeing themselves from patterns Corporate, anachronistic and self-legislation for the banking sector. Recent examples of bad corporate lawmaking and illiberal measures are the latest on the FCA and the Tub for financial advisers, brokers and agents in a credit institution activities 'financial, tending more' to create barriers to entry for oligopolies in the banking sector and savings, rather than actual benefits to consumers. These methodologies the lawmaking were born in historical periods in which autarkic principles existed, illiberal and undemocratic conduct of the economy, clearly in conflict with the principles of equality, freedom 'and co-operation of modern democracies.
(7) DPR 12/12/2006, Statute of the Bank of Italy, Art.1
(8) In view of this task was assigned by the central bank, the latter gets an income and 'called "seigniorage" [ http://www.bancaditalia.it/bancomonete/signoraggio ]
(9) For example, the ECB aims to keep rates below, but close to 2% the price increase. Treaty establishing the European Union, Article 105 [ http://www.bancaditalia.it/banca_mercati/polmon/obiettivi ]
(10) The supervisory controls are based on the collection and examination of documents and statistical and accounting data that the supervised entities send to the Bank of Italy, and on missions consist of inspections conducted by employees of the Bank of Italy at banks and other financial intermediaries. [ http://www.bancaditalia.it/vigilanza ]
(11) Banking Act (TUB), Leg. 383/1993, Art 5.
(12) The theory of asymmetric information is in one of the founding fathers George Akerlof. To explain the theory he does' reference to the used car market. [ http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/akerlof/ ]
(13) In Italy, Leg. 659/1996, Deposit Protection Fund Interbancartio [ http:// www.fitd.it/ ] - In the U.S., the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [ http://www.fdic.gov/ ]
(14) CACiampi, credit Ultimately, Milan 21/02/1992 [ http://www.carloazegliociampi.it/71?resource_1681=12202 ]
(15) chap. 1, footnote 8
(16) v. money multiplier, Wikipedia [ http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moltiplicatore_monetario ]. In the Middle Ages (1128 - 1312), the Order of Templi Salomonis Milites was undoubtedly the first global organization to benefit from the money multiplier (the cross and delight of these early " unpopular bankers ) [cf. http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavalieri_templari or http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordre_du_Temple ]. History attests to the ability 'of the Templars in financial management. With bequests, donations and other liberal 'Knights of the Temple soon became wealthy landowners and property. The constant trips to the Holy Land, the allowances enjoyed by the direct dependence on the pope, had meant that their fleet to become the most 'fast and safe in the Mediterranean. The Templars fee organize the transport of pilgrims to the Holy Land and their assets. Most powerful of view of reliability 'acquired by the Order, the management is entrusted to the custody of their strongholds in the remarkable treasures. To relieve the pilgrims during the journey to the Holy Land from the weight of gold coins, or to help the merchants during the trip feared assaults by bandits and other risks and invented the "letters of credit or bills of exchange" (modern bank money: checks). The pilgrim leaving - instead of 'travel to Europe with heavy burdens and dangerous - place coins in the order behind a receipt showing off to his arrival in the Holy Land to collect the corresponding amount of gold or d 'silver at another fortress of the Order. In essence, the light and despised paper (had recently replaced the parchment) circulated in place of the dangerous heavy metal. [See http://www.templaricavalieri.it/storia.htm ]. In time the Templars realized that only some of the assets deposited with them was materially collected. This was because 'creditors - for comfort' and reliability 'acquired by the Order in honoring the return of deposits - accepted as payment receipts for deposit instead of gold coins. Thus was born 'proto-type of paper money. Not only that, the Templars began to pay a fee (interest), in addition to the heritage of the Order, including that portion of gold deposited by third lying unproductive in their strongholds. Cosi 'for example, in the Reign of Philip IV of France said the beautiful, circulated as means of payment in addition to gold and silver coins minted by the Mint of the Kingdom, including the "letters of credit issued by the Order, the whose total pero 'non corrrispondeva entirely to coins deposited in their strongholds, but only a fraction of them. [See http://www.ricerchetemplari.it/l 'economia.htm ]. Not for nothing when the Templars were burned at the stake, were charged (and of heresy, sodomy and illegal practice of indulgences) in order to enrich the unlawful and necromancy, that is to practice spiritualism, 'cause they would be able to transmute base metals into gold. With today's eyes it seems clear that this ability 'to create the gold was not the result of alchemy, but the "magic" of the money multiplier! It was perhaps no heresy inflation and to declare the end of the Knights of the Temple! " In 1306, during of a devaluation, rise Parisian artisans, and Philip the Handsome temporarily suppresses all corporations "(see J. Goeff, 1967, Feltrinelli, Milan).
(17) The activity of banking business, so 'as structured in the universal banks - with business models discharging outside the credit risk, with economic re-washed as to prevent them from being allowed to fail, so' to force governments to intervene with substantial public resources to cover their losses and preserve the private savings - it is difficult to 'place, in Italy, nell'alveo art. 41 of the Constitution, which states that the initiative Private economic ... can not 'conducted in conflict with the utilities' capital. So ', given the serious implications of the failure of a universal bank, its activities' private economic runs counter with the Constitution and the law should prohibit (limit negative) that were formed bank conglomerates that constitute a real danger to public finances and savings of citizens. The law should instead direct and coordinate the activities' private banking in order to pursue social objectives, without risking depletion of the nation. In this context, the reserve (including any amount to a minimum) the collection of savings from the public in favor of banks, as provided by art. 11, D. Lgs. 385/1993 (the Banking Act - TUB), where it was once intended to be an oligopoly banking firm in the banking sector to strengthen it, today is anachronistic and - given the enormous technical and technological the control of money - quite unjustifiable as well as dangerous to freedom 'and democracy.