In relation to post "retirement age " published on the opposable thumb, and post " PENSION POST-MORTEM " published in shards of glass, a friend of mine (accountant) sent me the following mail:
I am a mathematician, and so I prefer the numbers make it clear concept and leave no room for doubt
I give you an example:
INPS contributions on a salary of $ 1,000 in net bag = 550 About
a monthly employee 14. So 14 x 550 = 7700 nodded
Years of work 40. So 40 x 7700 = 308,000 total
We give you the pension equal to the salary? But yes, we are generous.
means equal to 308 months 22 years to 14 months (retirees will see only 13) that added to the year of entry into retirement 65 years ago?
Exact 87. How come there are? And all that burst after 5 or 6 years who retire? And I have seen interest in the 40 years of contributions. In fact, simply calculate an average rate of 3% in 40 years, almost 190,000 Euro. Then we assume a cost structure to make these rapid INPS accounts made by me. Valutiamolo $ 1,000 in the year. Makes about 40,000 euros to 190,000 is removed from it that there are another 150,000 euros available to others that are always 10 years 14 months and then we get to 97 years.
then synthesized. To fuck all the percentages, corrections and more.
my Question: "And no one takes all the money (because the first lineage) but remain INPS?"
Answer: "There are INPS why you need to pay the pensions of those 35 years have stopped working together and to put in 70 years and today are the envy of a healthy 30-year-old .
murtecc Good job ... I '...
0 comments:
Post a Comment